Academic (University) preparation with worked examples, written practice and independent learning assessments.
Independent university-level study of Philosophy of Mind. This original curriculum draws on public academic subject descriptions; it is not an official faculty syllabus, university credit, accreditation or an Ivy League qualification. Topics covered: Mind-body problem; Mental causation; First-person evidence; Conceptual analysis. Dualism; Behaviorism; Identity theory; Functionalism. Consciousness; Qualia; Explanatory gap; Knowledge argument. Intentionality; Mental content; Representation; Externalism. Perception; Hallucination; Sense data; Embodied cognition. Artificial minds; Computation; Turing test; Chinese room. Personal identity; Memory; Agency; Free will. Neuroscientific evidence; Animal minds; Ethical implications; Philosophical argument. Projects use safe simulations, public datasets or textual analysis; specialist subject review is required. Includes lessons, supplementary YouTube tutorials, practical exercises, quizzes and free/paid practice tests. Erudex is independent, not affiliated with the source institution or awarding body. Its 80% learning checks are not official grades or university credit. Content requires qualified subject review before use as a complete teaching programme.
One complete track with its own final exam and certificate.
Independent university-level study of Philosophy of Mind. This original curriculum draws on public academic subject descriptions; it is not an official faculty syllabus, university credit, accreditation or an Ivy League qualification. Topics covered: Mind-body problem; Mental causation; First-person evidence; Conceptual analysis. Dualism; Behaviorism; Identity theory; Functionalism. Consciousness; Qualia; Explanatory gap; Knowledge argument. Intentionality; Mental content; Representation; Externalism. Perception; Hallucination; Sense data; Embodied cognition. Artificial minds; Computation; Turing test; Chinese room. Personal identity; Memory; Agency; Free will. Neuroscientific evidence; Animal minds; Ethical implications; Philosophical argument. Projects use safe simulations, public datasets or textual analysis; specialist subject review is required.
Mind-body problem; Mental causation; First-person evidence; Conceptual analysis